Science for Peace: What kind of future? February 25, 2020January 1, 1994 by Science for Peace The Soviet empire crumbled some years ago. The search for world peace has widened to include…
Science for Peace Position 2017? NATO, Canada, USA, and Russia December 5, 2019February 13, 2017 by Science for Peace Should Science for Peace, an educational organization promoting non-violence and nuclear disarmament: continue…
Science for Peace in the Decisive Decade October 19, 2021 by Arnd Juergensen Today we face at least three overlapping, existential crises: militarism, the climate crisis and the collapse of biodiversity. While…
Science for Peace Calls for a Peaceful Settlement in Ukraine March 7, 2022February 26, 2022 by Science for Peace February 26, 2022 Science for Peace condemns the Russian decision to launch military…
Resolving the Climate Emergency March 27, 2020 by Science for Peace Science for Peace urges immediate and emergency action on the terrifying warming of our planet, now proceeding at a rate hitherto…
Resolution on the Don’t Bank on the Bomb Campaign January 30, 2020November 5, 2018 by Science for Peace Approved by the Science for Peace Board, Nov. 5, 2018 Recognizing the existential threat…
Preventing the Weaponization of Space February 25, 2020March 27, 2003 by Science for Peace Introduction: The Challenge The beauty and wonder of the night sky could soon be spoiled if the US…
Peace and Sustainability Education February 26, 2020June 11, 2009 by Science for Peace Who we are: Participants in the Working Group on Peace & Sustainability Education, are members of a joint group…
Nuclear Weapons: Just Say “No”! February 21, 2020June 20, 2008 by Science for Peace Speech to the DPI Conference, April 8, 2008 Last October I wrote to our Foreign Minister to ask…
Nonviolence working group March 24, 2016 by Science for Peace Next meeting in Room 044, University College, 7pm Thurs Mar 24 (time and location provisional). Contact for more details.