Month: February 2017

by Metta Spencer If you join a group such as Science for Peace, you have to learn its culture, which is mostly a matter of learning its language. For most … Read more The President’s Corner: Science for Peace as a Foreign Language

(2016-09-17) Members: Helmut Burkhardt (chair), Norman Dyson, Rose Dyson, Brydon Gombay, Julia Morton-Marr, Tom Simunovic, Peter Venton, Adnan Zuberi Mandate: We believe good global governance is meaningful, feasible and necessary. … Read more Report of the Working Group on Global Governance

(2016-10-25) While anti-militarists are skilled in contesting the West’s armed intervention in Iraq and Syria, many of us are far less convincing when it comes to articulating what a non-violent … Read more Report of the Working Group on Non-violence

Should Science for Peace, an educational organization promoting non-violence and nuclear disarmament: continue to be silent on Canada’s role in NATO? advocate a security model based on the United Nations … Read more Science for Peace Position 2017? NATO, Canada, USA, and Russia

(source: www.cnas.org/fact-sheet/a-NATO-primer#.V5s4j49OJYc )

Geotechnical politics of Ocean Frontiers
Comparative perspectives on Asian & North American disputes and synergies in Global Development
Peace Research Lecture Series: 2016-2017
Organized by the Ocean Frontiers Research Working Group-Science for Peace, Canada
Supported by York Center for Asian Research (YCAR), York University, Toronto, Canada

(2017-01-03) As we begin a new year, the formidable task of eliminating nuclear weapons remains before us. 2016 was intense for anyone following the politics surrounding nuclear weapons, and although … Read more Report of the Nuclear Weapons working group

(source: www.icanw.org/campaign-news/un-votes-to-outlaw-nuclear-weapons-in-2017)